Andy Martino, evaluating the Mets, gives Johan Santana just a B .
And Jerry Manuel gets only a B-?
So why only a B for Santana? Apparently because he's only 7-5. But Santana has posted a fine 2.98 ERA, and if you fill out one bad game - a 10-run disaster against the Phillies - he's all the way down to 2.
0. A pitcher can only see what he does to other batters, not the brook he gets from his team.
More inexplicable is Jerry Manuel's B- because "he failed to convince [Jose] Reyes to send to batting third, insulted [John] Maine by joking that the injured deliverer should pitch on off days, and showed strange strategic tendencies, particularly with the bullpen."
Look, Andy, Jose's failure to yield to batting third is an attitude problem on his part, not a shift of Manuel's.
Maine has an ERA of 6.13, and Jerry was only joking. And as fickle as the Mets' bullpen has been, any strategic tendencies open to a coach are destined to be strange.
The way Reyes and Jason Bay have been hitting most of the season, and as irregular as the pitching staff has been, we get to close that Manuel is the glue that's held this team together so far. He deserves an A more than any other manager in the National League.
"We have learned that these Mets are an entertaining team," writes Martino, "but we don't yet know how well they are."Well, now that Carlos Beltran is back, we'll get out.
As for Mark Feinsand's Yankees scorecard, why is there a minus next to C.C. Sabathia's A?
The Big Man is 12-3 and lead the American Conference in wins. Who cares now if he had a miserable five-start stretch in May?Does he take to go 13-1 to get an A ?
Ditto with Phil Hughes, who gets graded down to A- for . . . what, exactly? Hughes is 11-2 with a 3.65 ERA. Forget that he was 5-0 with a 1.38 ERA through his first five decisions.Back during spring training, if you thought he'd be 11-2 at the All-Star break, wouldn't you have ranked him A ? I would have.
No comments:
Post a Comment